The Korean Society Fishries And Sciences Education
[ Article ]
The Journal of the Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education - Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.412-420
ISSN: 1229-8999 (Print) 2288-2049 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Apr 2023
Received 03 Mar 2023 Revised 13 Apr 2023 Accepted 19 Apr 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2023.4.35.2.412

Effects of Different Feeding Frequency on the Growth, Feed utilization and Body Composition of Juvenile Eel Anguilla japonica in Semi-RAS(Recirculating Aquaculture System)

Yi-Oh KIM
Chungcheongbuk-do Inland Fisheries Research Institute(researcher)
반순환여과시스템내에서 사료 공급 횟수가 뱀장어(Anguilla japonica) 치어의 성장, 사료 이용성 및 체조성에 미치는 영향
김이오
충청북도내수면산업연구소(연구사)

Correspondence to: 043-220-6511, kimio@korea.kr

Abstract

A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effect of feeding frequency on the growth performance and body composition of juvenile eel, Anguilla japonica. Duplicate groups of fish (initial fish weight, 0.93 g/fish) were fed to apparent satiation at one, two, three, or four meals per day for 8 weeks. The results of the present study showed that weight gain and specific growth rate of fish fed one meal per day were significantly lower than those of fish fed three and four meals per day, were not affected by two meals per day. Daily feed intake of fish fed one meal per day was significantly lower than that of fish fed four meals per day, was not affected by two meals and three meals per day. Feed efficiency, daily protein intake and protein efficiency ratio were not affected by feeding frequency. The moisture, crude protein, crude lipid and crude ash were not affected by feeding frequency. Consequently, the present results suggested that optimum feeding frequency of juvenile eel (average weigth 0.9 to 3 g) is three meals per day.

Keywords:

Eel, Anguilla japonica, Feeding frequency, Growth, Feed utilization

Ⅰ. Introduction

There are 18 species of fish in the genus Anguillidae that are known worldwide (Aoyama et al., 2001), and the species Anguilla japonica (Japanese eel) and Anguilla marmorata (Marbled eel) inhabit South Korea (Kim et al., 2008). Four species of eels are commonly farmed: Anguilla anguilla (North American eel), Anguilla rostrata (European eel), Anguilla bicolor (Southeast Asian eel), and Anguilla japonica (Japanese eel), which are mainly farmed species in South Korea (Kim YH, 2013). Anguilla japonica is a representative freshwater fish species that is rich in protein, fat, minerals, and vitamins compared to other fish species and has long been used as a favorite food in Southeast Asia, including South Korea, Japan, and China (Choi et al., 2011). It is a very important cultured species in East Asia owing to its high market value, desirable taste, and recent supply shortage (Zheng et al., 2019). Regarding the history of eel farming in South Korea, until the early 1970s, live eels floating on the coast were mainly captured, grown to an average weight of about 2 g, and exported to Japan and Taiwan as intermediate nursery stock. Domestic farming has been practiced since the late 1970s, and since the 2000s, farming has been actively carried out with the introduction of a practical recirculating aquaculture system. Therefore, to increase the production and productivity of eel farming, various studies are needed on breeding methods, feed quality improvement, and feeding supply systems. Feeding methods that can increase the growth rate and survival of fish, reduce size differences among individuals, and minimize the amount of wasted feed and labor costs, along with maintaining feed efficiency, are necessary (Kubitz and Lovshin, 1999; Oh and Park, 2016; Kim YO, 2022a). In particular, feeding frequency is an important factor affecting feed availability, growth, and metabolite excretion in fish (Silva et al., 2007; Biswas et al., 2010), and inappropriate feeding frequency reduces fish growth and feed efficiency, which ultimately increases the cost of fish aquaculture production (Oh and Maran, 2015; Kim et al., 2020). Thus, information on the optimal number of feedings that are economically feasible is essential for successful fish farming (Silva et al., 2007; Kim YO, 2022b). In this regard, feeding frequency plays a crucial role in improving aquaculture productivity by inducing maximum growth and feed efficiency of farmed fish; therefore, determining the optimal feeding frequency is necessary (Kim et al., 2022a; Kim et al., 2022b). In addition, proper feeding frequency can provide information on the daily feed intake of farmed fish and the timing of feeding to establish a planned feeding system (Oh and Park, 2016).

Therefore, to increase the production of eel aquaculture, the appropriate feeding frequency should be investigated and applied to aquaculture sites. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of feeding frequency on growth and feed utilization and composition in eel fry rearing.


Ⅱ. Material and methods

1. Fish and rearing condition

Self-reared juvenile eel, Anguilla japonica, from the Chungcheongbuk-do Island Fisheries Research Institute, was used in the experiment. Two weeks before the start of the experiment, experimental feed was supplied twice a day for pre-breeding. After the pre-breeding period, 30 juvenile eels (0.93 ± 0.01 g) were randomly distribute to 8 tanks (200 L each) with a replicate groups and reared for 8 weeks.

Eel breeding was conducted similar to a previous experiment (Kim YO, 2022a; Kim YO, 2022b) in a semi-circular filtration system comprising one set of square-shaped sedimentation tanks (2 m × 1 m × 1.2 m; 2,000 L) and eight circular experimental tanks (diameter 0.6 m × height 1 m; 200 L), with water temperature maintained at 26 ℃. The circular water tanks containing the experimental fish were maintained at the same breeding environment with water temperature of 25 ℃, pH of 6.2–7.8, and DO of 6.3–7.5.

2. Experimental design

The feed supplied during the experiment was the commercial formulated feed (Chunhajeil Co., Daejeon, Korea; 8.4% moisture, 56.1% crude protein, 11.0% crude lipid, and 8.2% crude ash) mainly used by fish farmers on site. Feed was supplied four times (08:30, 11:30, 14:30, 17:30) a day, thrice (08:30, 13:00, 17:30) a day, twice (08:30, 17:30) a day, and once (08:30) a day full stomach.

3. Fish measurement and body content analysis

For fish measurement, fish were not fed for 1 day before the day of measurement, at the beginning and at the end of the rearing experiment. Length and weight of the fish were measured under anesthesia using a 100 ppm aqueous solution of tricaine methanesulfonate (MS 222, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

To analyze body composition, ten fish from each experimental tank were collected and frozen at –25 °C before analysis. Experimental feed and general whole-body proximate were analyzed using standard procedures (AOAC, 1995). Crude protein content was measured by the Kjeldahl method using an Auto Kjeldahl System (Buchi B-324/435/412, Switzerland; Metrohm 8-719/806, Switzerland). Crude lipid was extracted using ether, and moisture was measured after drying in a dry oven at 105 °C for 6 h. Crude ash content was measured after burning in a muffle furnace at 600 °C for 4 h.

4. Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of results, one-way ANOVA was performed by using SPSS Ver. 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.), followed by analysis of different between mean values using Duncan’s multiple range test (P<0.05) (Duncan’s, 1995). Levene’s test was used to validate the homogeneity of variance, and percentage data were arcsine-transformed prior to ANOVA.

Ingredient and proximate composition of experimental diets for eel Anguilla japonica.


Ⅲ. Results

Growth and feed utilization of eel juveniles as a function of feeding frequency are shown in <Tables 2 and 3>, respectively. The survival rate of all experimental groups during the rearing experiment was 100%, with no significant difference between experimental groups (P>0.05). Weight gain and specific growth rate were significantly lower in the one meal a day feeding group than in the three meals a day and four meals a day feeding groups (P<0.05), with no significant difference observed in the two meals a day feeding group (P>0.05). Feed efficiency was not significantly different between treatments (P>0.05). Daily feed intake was significantly lower in the one meal a day group than in the four meals a day group (P<0.05), with no significant difference between the two meals a day and three meals a day groups (P>0.05). Daily protein intake and protein efficiency ratio were not significantly different between the experimental groups (P>0.05).

Growth performance of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

Daily feed intake (DFI), feed efficiency (FE), daily protein intake (DPI) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

The condition factor and coefficient of variation of eel juveniles fed the experimental diets according to the number of feedings for 8 weeks are shown in <Table 4>. Condition factor (CF), coefficient of variation of body length (CVBL), and coefficient of variation of body weight (CVBW) were not significantly different between the experimental groups (P>0.05).

Condition factor (CF), coefficient variation of body length (CVBL), and body weight (CVBW) of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

The condition factor and coefficient of variation of eel juveniles fed the experimental diets according to the number of feedings for 8 weeks are shown in Table 4. Condition factor (CF), coefficient of variation of body length (CVBL), and coefficient of variation of body weight (CVBW) were not significantly different between the experimental groups (P>0.05).

<Table 5> shows the results of the principal component analysis of the entire fish body according to the number of feedings. The moisture, crude protein, crude lipid, and crude ash contents of the entire fish body were not significantly different between the experimental groups (P>0.05).

Proximate composition (%) of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1


Ⅳ. Discussion

Determining the appropriate feeding frequency for farmed fish species is important for improving aquaculture productivity to obtain maximum growth and feed efficiency and for reducing economic loss and water pollution caused by feed loss due to overfeeding (Ng et al., 2000; Mihelakakis et al., 2002). The optimal feeding frequency has been reported to differ depending on factors, such as diet, habitat environment, and the size of the fish species. Studies that investigated the appropriate feeding frequency to induce maximum growth have reported that rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Ruohonen et al., 1998) and koi (Cyprinus carpio var. koi) (Kim and Lee, 2010) are suitable for feeding four meals a day; tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Riche et al., 2004), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) (Choi et al., 2011), and Crucian carp (Carassius auratus) (Kim Yo, 2022b) three meals a day; masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou) (Seong and Kim, 2008), golden mandarin fish (Siniperca scherzeri) (Kim et al., 2020), and pond loach (Misgurnus mizolepis) (Kim YO, 2022a) two meals a day; black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii) (Lee et al., 2000b) one meal a day; and esturary grouper (Epinephelus tauvina) one meal every 2 days (Chua and Teng, 1978). Although increasing the feeding frequency increases growth and feed intake of fish, many studies have reported that feeding more than a certain frequency does not affect the fish growth or actually reduces fish growth (Lee et al., 2000a; Mizanur and Bai, 2014; Oh and Maran 2015; Oh and Park, 2016; Kim et al., 2020; Kim YO, 2022a; Kim Yo, 2022b). Likewise, in this study, as the feeding frequency increased, weight gain, the daily growth rate, and the daily feed intake rate increased. As the feeding frequency increased, although the daily feed intake rate increased, there was no difference in the growth and daily growth rates between the experimental groups fed with three and four meals a day. A similar trend was also shown in other fish species.

In an experiment conducted on rainbow trout, Hong Kong grouper (Epinephelus akaara), olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus), golden mandarin fish, pond loach, and Crucian carp, it was reported that the growth rates did not improve further with more than the appropriate feeding frequencies (Grayton and Beamish, 1977; Kayano et al., 1993; Kim et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2020; Kim YO, 2022a; Kim Yo, 2022b). On the other hand, in an experiment targeting black rockfish and dolly varden char (Salvelinus malma) fry, the growth rate decreased at a certain feeding frequency in the results (Lee et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2013; Oh and Park, 2016; Guo et al., 2018). Depending on the species and size of the fish, the frequency and amount of feed intake may vary. In this study, The daily feed intake rate increased for groups fed up to four times a day as the feeding frequency increased, although there was no difference in the feed efficiency among the experimental groups even when the daily feed intake rate was increased according to the increase in feeding frequency. This is because when the feeding frequency is increased or the feeding interval is shortened, the time for the excessively ingested feed to pass through the digestive tract decreases, resulting in inefficient digestion (Biswas et al., 2010; Mizanur and Bai, 2014; Oh and Park, 2016; Guo et al., 2018). Regarding striped beakfish (Oplegnathus fasciatus) (Oh and Maran, 2015) and rohu (Labeo rohita) (Biswas et al., 2006), The feeding frequency appeared to have no effect on the feed efficiency, showing similar results to this experiment; however, it has also been shown that the feeding frequency has an effect on the feed efficiency (Kang et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2020; Kim YO, 2022a; Kim YO, 2022b). These differences were shown to vary depending on the fish species and experimental conditions.

In addition, even between the same fish species, the optimal feeding frequency for the maximum growth of fish varies depending on the size of the fish body, type and nutrient content of the feed, and breeding conditions. In particular, it varies depending on the size of the fish body; Regarding olive flounder, it was reported that the optimal feeding frequency was three meals a day at satiation for fry with an average weight of 1.5 to 4 g (Lee et al., 1999), two or three meals a day at satiation for fry with an average weight of 3.5 to 15 g (Lee et al., 2000a), and two meals a day for fry with an average weight of 45 to 53 g (Kim et al., 2005a). For eels, it was reported that the optimal feeding frequency for 6.8-mm fry was five meals a day (Kim et al., 2020). This is considered to be due to the fact that as the size of the body increases, the internal organs grow as well, taking longer time for the intestines to be emptied after feeding. In view of these results, it is thought to be reasonable to determine the appropriate feeding frequency considering the species and size of the target fish. It is judged that the optimal feeding frequency of eel fry (0.9∼3 g) in this study is three meals a day.

As a result of this experiment, there was no difference in size (i.e., CV) between objects according to the feeding frequency, showing similar results to the previous gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) (Zhou et al., 2003), white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) (Cui et al., 1997), Misgurnus mizolepis) (Kim YO, 2022a), and Carassius auratus (Kim YO, 2022b) studies.

It has been reported that excessive feeding beyond the optimal feeding frequency can decrease fish quality by increasing the fat accumulated in the body (Yao et al., 1994; Oh and Maran 2015; Kim YO, 2022a; Kim YO, 2022b). However, in this experiment, no significant difference was found in moisture, the crude protein, crude lipid and crude ash content of whole fish in all the experiment groups regardless of the feeding frequency; similar reports exist (Lee et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2005a; Kim et al., 2005b; Lee et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2020). This is considered to be due to the energy ratio of protein of the experimental feed being optimal or due to having no difference in the feed intake rate when feeding more than two meals a day.

Based on the results, the optimal feeding frequency is three meals a day at satiation, considering the growth and feed availability of eel fry (average weight 0.9 to 3 g).

References

  • AOAC(1955). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, U.S.A. 1298.
  • Aoyama J, Nishida M and Tsukamoto K(2001). Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the freshwater Eel, Genus Anguilla. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20(3), 450~459. [https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0959]
  • Biswas G, Jena JK, Singh SK, Patmajhi P and Muduli HK(2006). Effect of feeding frequency on growth, survival and feed utilization in mrigal, Cirrhinus mrigala, and rohu, Labeo rohita, during nursery rearing. Aquaculture 254(2), 211~218. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.08.001]
  • Biswas G, Thirunavukkarasu AR, Sundaray JK and Kaliasam M(2010). Optimization of feeding frequency of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) fry reared in net cages under brackishwater environment. Aquaculture 305(1), 26~31. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.04.002]
  • Choi YU, Park HS and OH SY(2011). Effects of stocking density and feeding frequency on the growth of the pacific cod, Gadus macrocephalus. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 44(1), 58~63. [https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2011.44.1.058]
  • Chua TE and Teng SK(1978). Effects of feeding frequency on the growth of young estuary grouper, Epinephelus tauvina (Forskal), culture in floating net-cages. Aquaculture 14(1), 31~47. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(78)90138-2]
  • Cui Y, Hung SSO, Deng DF and Yang Y(1997). Growth performance of juvenile white sturgeon as affected by feeding regimen. Prog Fish Cult 59(1), 31~35. [https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1997)059%3C0031:gpojws%3E2.3.co;2]
  • Duncan DB(1955). Multiple-range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1~42. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478]
  • Grayton BD and Beamish FWH(1977). Effects of feeding frequency on food intake, growth and body composition of rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri. Aquaculture 11(2), 159~172. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(77)90073-4]
  • Guo ZG, Cui J, Li M, Liu H, Zhang M, Meng F, Shi G, Wang R, He X and Zhao Y(2018). Effect of feeding frequency on growth performance, antioxidant status, immune response and resistance to hypoxia dtress challenge on juvenile dolly varden char Salvelinus malma. Aquaculture 489(3), 197~201. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.031]
  • Kang HW, Cho JK, Son MH, Hong CG and Park JY(2015). Effect of feeding frequency on growth and body composition of juvenile river puffer, Takifugu obscurus in winter season. JFMSE 27(3), 718~724. [https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2015.27.3.718]
  • Kayano Y, Yao S, Yamamoto S and Nakagawa H(1993). Effects of feeding frequency on the growth and body constituents of young red-spotted grouper, Epinephelus akaara. Aquaculture 110(3), 271~278. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(93)90375-9]
  • Kim GU, Jang HS, Seo JY and Lee SM(2005). Effect of feeding frequency of extruded pellet on growth and body composition of juvenile flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus during the winter season. J Aquaculture 18(1), 31~36.
  • Kim KM, Kim KD, Choi SM, Kim KW and Kang YJ(2005). Optimum feeding frequency of extruded pellet for the growth of juvenile flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus during the summer season. J Aquaculture 18(4), 231~235.
  • Kim KD, Nam MM, Kim KW, Lee HY, Hur SB, Kang YJ and Son MH(2009). Effects of feeding frequency on growth and body composition of sub-adult flounder Paralichthys olivaceus in subopitimal water temperature. Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 42(3), 262~267. [https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2009.42.3.262]
  • Kim SW, Rim SK, Sohn SG and Lee JH(2008). Comparison of growth and water quality in juvenile Japanese Eel, Anguilla japonica fed commercial extruded pellet and paste type diets. JFMSE 20(1), 90~94.
  • Kim YH(2013). Study on the aquaculture of eel (Anguillidae; Anguilla japonica) using with the intensive pond system and the recirculation culture system. Honam university, Gwangju.
  • Kim YO and Lee SM(2010). Effects of feeding frequency and satiation rate on the growth and body composition of Red- and White-colored carp, Cyprinus carpio var. koi. Kor J Fish Aquat Sci 43(4), 320~324. [https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.4.320]
  • Kim YO(2022a). Effects of different feeding frequency on the growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile mud loach Misgurnus mizolepis in semi-RAS(semi-recirculating aquaculture system). JFMSE 34(5), 864~871. [https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2022.10.34.5.864]
  • Kim YO(2022b). Effects of different feeding frequency on the growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile crucian carp Carassius auratus in semi-RAS(semi-recirculating aquaculture system). JFMSE 34(6), 960~967. [https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2022.12.34.6.960]
  • Kim YO, Oh SY and Lee SM(2020). Influence of different feeding frequency on the growth and body composition of juvenile mandarin fish Siniperca scherzeri reared in a recirculating aquaculture system(RAS). Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 53(4), 538~543. [https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2020.0538]
  • Kubitz F and Lovshin LL(1999). Formulated diets, feeding strategies, and cannibalism control during intensive culture of juvenile fishes. Rev Fish Sci 7(1), 1~22. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10641269991319171]
  • Lee JH, Lee BJ, Kim KW, Han HS, Park GH, Lee JH, Yun HH and Bai SC(2013). Optimal feeding frequency for juvenile Korean rockfish Sebastes schlegeli fed commercial diet at two different water temperature. Kor J Fish Sci 46(6), 761~768. [https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2013.0761]
  • Lee SM, Seo CH and Cho YS(1999). Growth of the juvenile olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) fed the diets at different feeding frequencies. J. Korean Fish Soc 32(1), 18~21.
  • Lee SM, Cho SH and Kim DJ(2000a). Effects of feeding frequency and dietary energy level on growth and body composition of juvenile flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture 31(12), 917~921. [https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00505.x]
  • Lee SM, Hwang UG and Cho SH(2000b). Effects of feeding frequency and dietary moisture content on growth, body composition and gastric evacuation of juvenile Korean rockfish Sebastes schlegeli. Aquaculture 187(4), 399~409. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(00)00318-5]
  • Mihelakakis A, Tsolkas C and Yoshimatsu T( 2002). Optimization of Feeding Rate for Hatchery-Produced Juvenile Gilthead Sea Bream Sparus aurata. J. World Aquaculture Society 33(2). 169~175. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2002.tb00491.x]
  • Mizanur RM and Bai SC(2014). The optimum feeding frequency in growing Korean rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli) rearing at the temperature of 15℃ and 19℃. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 27(9), 1319~1327. [https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14193]
  • Ng WK, Lu KS, Hashim R and Ali A(2000). Effects of feeding rate on growth, feed utilization and body composition of a tropical bargrid catfish. Aquacult Int 8. 19~29. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009216831360]
  • Oh SY and Maran BAV(2015). Feeding frequency influences growth, feed consumption and body composition of juvenile rock bream (Oplegnathus fasciatus). Aquacult Int 23(1), 175~184. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9806-2]
  • Oh SY and Park JW(2016). Feeding frequency influences the growth, food consumption, body composition and hematological response of the Korean rockfish, Sebastes schlegelii. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 49(5), 600~606. [https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2016.0600]
  • Riche M, Haley DI, Oetker M, Garbrecht S and Garling DL(2004). Effects of feeding frequency on gastric evacuation and the return of appetite in tilapia Oreochromis niliticus. Aquaculture 234(4), 657~673. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.12.012]
  • Ruohonen KJ, Vielman J and Grove DJ(1998). Effects of feeding frequency on growth and food utilization of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed low-fat herring or dry pellets. Aquaculture 165(2), 111~121. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(98)00235-x]
  • Seong KB and Kim DH(2008). Effects of feeding frequency on the optimum growth of cherry salmon, Oncorhynchus masou. J. Kor. Fish Soc. 41(5), 343~345. [https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2008.41.5.343]
  • Silva CR, Gomes LC and Brandao FR(2007). Effect of feeding rate and frequency on tambaqui(Colossoma macropomum) growth, production and feeding costs during the first growth phase in cages. Aquaculture 264(2), 135~139. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.007]
  • Yao SJ, Umino T and Nakagawa H(1994). Effect of feeding frequency on lipid accumulation in ayu. Fish Sci. 60(6), 667~671. [https://doi.org/10.2331/fishsci.60.667]
  • Zheng CC, Cai XY, Huang MM, Mkingule I, Sun C, Qian SC, Wu Zj, Han BN and Fei H(2019). Effect of biological additives on japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) growth performance, digestive enzymes activity and immunology. J Fish and Shellfish 84, 704~710. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.10.048]
  • Zhou Z, Cui Y, Xie S, Zhu X, Lei W, Xue M and Yang Y(2003). Effect of feeding frequency on growth, feed utilization, and size variation of juvenile gible carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). J Appl Ichthyol 19(4), 244~249. [https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00453.x]

<Table 1>

Ingredient and proximate composition of experimental diets for eel Anguilla japonica.

Ingredients (%) Diets
1Fish Commercial formulated feed produced from Chunhajeil incorporation (Daejeon, Korea).
Commercial diet1
Chemical analysis (% of dry matter basis)
Moisture 8.4
Crude protein 56.1
Crude lipid 11.0
Crude ash 8.2

<Table 2>

Growth performance of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

Feeding frequency
/day
Initial mean
weight (g)
Final mean
weight (g)
Survival
(%)
Weight gain (%)2 Specific growth rate
(%/day)3
1Values (mean±SE of duplicate groups) with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
2Weight gain (%) = (final body weight - initial body weight) × 100/initial body weight.
3Specific growth rate = (Ln final weight of fish – Ln initial weight of fish) × 100/days of feeding trial.
nsNot significant (P>0.05).
One meal 0.94±0.02ns 2.59±0.04a 100±0.0ns 176.9±0.25a 1.82±0.01a
Two meals 0.92±0.01 2.75±0.04ab 100±0.0 198.4±0.55ab 1.96±0.01ab
Three meals 0.93±0.02 3.07±0.13b 100±0.0 232.9±20.7b 2.15±0.12b
Four meals 0.93±0.01 3.09±0.19b 100±0.0 232.4±15.5b 2.15±0.09b

<Table 3>

Daily feed intake (DFI), feed efficiency (FE), daily protein intake (DPI) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

Feeding frequency
/day
DFI(%)2 FE(%)3 DPI(%)4 PER(%)5
1Values (mean±SE of duplicate groups) with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
2Daily feed intake = feed intake × 100 / [(initial fish wt. + final fish wt. + dead fish wt.) × days reared / 2].
3Feed efficiency = fish wet weight gain×100/feed intake (dry matter).
4Daily protein intake = protein intake × 100 / [(initial fish wt. + final fish wt. + dead fish wt.) × days reared / 2].
5Protein efficiency ratio = weight gain of fish / protein intake.
nsNot significant (P>0.05).
One meal 2.13±0.05a 78.9±1.80ns 1.17±0.03ns 1.44±0.04ns
Two meals 2.26±0.06ab 78.9±2.05 1.24±0.03 1.44±0.04
Three meals 2.37±0.06ab 81.0±1.45 1.30±0.03 1.47±0.03
Four meals 2.56±0.19b 75.7±7.80 1.41±0.11 1.38±0.15

<Table 4>

Condition factor (CF), coefficient variation of body length (CVBL), and body weight (CVBW) of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

Feeding frequency / day CF(%)2 CVBL(%)3 CVBW(%)4
1Values (mean±SE of duplicate groups) with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
2CF(%) = [weight of fish / (length of fish)3] × 100.
3CVBL(%) = (standard deviation of final length of fish / mean final length of fish) × 100.
4CVBW(%) = (standard deviation of final weight of fish / mean final weight of fish) × 100.
nsNot significant (P>0.05).
One meal 0.09±0.01ns 13.5±0.55ns 56.4±1.05ns
Two meals 0.10±0.01 13.3±0.35 51.2±1.75
Three meals 0.10±0.01 11.7±0.40 54.8±1.55
Four meals 0.10±0.01 13.1±0.60 53.1±1.65

<Table 5>

Proximate composition (%) of eel Anguilla japonica fed experiment diets for 8 weeks1

Diets
One meal Two meals Three meals Four meals
1Values (mean±SE of duplicate groups) with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
nsNot significant (P>0.05).
Proximate composition (% wet weight)
Moisture 65.0±1.80ns 64.8±2.00 64.0±0.10 63.1±0.90
Crude protein 15.4±0.05ns 15.6±0.45 16.4±0.35 16.2±0.01
Crude lipid 18.3±0.40ns 18.5±1.25 19.6±0.10 19.9±0.80
Crude ash 1.18±0.12ns 1.23±0.03 1.01±0.10 1.15±0.20